Orton vs Wyatt by a mileHeadlock wrote:So wich Match will be worst, Orton vs Wyatt or Orton vs. Mhal
BIngo. Which is why the outrage about Jinder getting a title shot seemed so weird to me. It's a Point A to Point B match, that's all. I'd much rather random challengers emerge from time-to-time versus getting the same title matches over and over again. Plus, being in Chicago, WWE smartly made sure to give the crowd plenty to sink their teeth into with AJ/Owens and Nak/Ziggler. I have no issues whatsoever and as we're getting closer and closer to the show, I'm contemplating if I should go or not (haven't missed a WWE PPV in Chicago in quite some time)mlev76 wrote:Two thoughts on the show based on last night's Smackdown:
1) Putting aside the question of whether they should have chosen Jinder at all, they have done a very good job of building him up to seem credible. When you consider where he was pre-Mania, it's clear that mechanism to make someone, anyone into a legit contender is very much still available if and when they choose to use it. Imagine where someone who wasn't a just above prelim guy would be if they were put in the same spot.
2) Based on the hype, potential quality and advertising, it's clear that the title match is at best the third most important match on the show (behind AJ/Owens and Nakamura/Ziggler) and potentially fourth most important depending on your feelings on the state of the Women's division.
Pretty solid show on paper and likely getting Zayn/Corbin and maybe one more match to round it all out.Rich Kraetsch wrote:BIngo. Which is why the outrage about Jinder getting a title shot seemed so weird to me. It's a Point A to Point B match, that's all. I'd much rather random challengers emerge from time-to-time versus getting the same title matches over and over again. Plus, being in Chicago, WWE smartly made sure to give the crowd plenty to sink their teeth into with AJ/Owens and Nak/Ziggler. I have no issues whatsoever and as we're getting closer and closer to the show, I'm contemplating if I should go or not (haven't missed a WWE PPV in Chicago in quite some time)mlev76 wrote:Two thoughts on the show based on last night's Smackdown:
1) Putting aside the question of whether they should have chosen Jinder at all, they have done a very good job of building him up to seem credible. When you consider where he was pre-Mania, it's clear that mechanism to make someone, anyone into a legit contender is very much still available if and when they choose to use it. Imagine where someone who wasn't a just above prelim guy would be if they were put in the same spot.
2) Based on the hype, potential quality and advertising, it's clear that the title match is at best the third most important match on the show (behind AJ/Owens and Nakamura/Ziggler) and potentially fourth most important depending on your feelings on the state of the Women's division.
